Making the Case for Mobile Marketing: Keeping Your SMS Engine Humming with Mobil1 Lube Express

by Victor Green
3 mins read

Key takeaways

  • SMS outperformed email and direct mail in response rate, speed and ROI in Mobil1 Lube Express’s six-month Willow Grove test.
  • Response rates (within 45 days): SMS 35%, email 29%, direct mail 21%; SMS responders returned 8.4 days sooner on average.
  • ROI per dollar: SMS $344, email $308, direct mail $24. Per-return cost: SMS $0.20, email $0.24, direct mail $2.76.
  • Opt-in flow: customers texted their license plate plus the short code OILCHG, then selected preferred reminder channel (text, email or mail).
  • Recommended approach from the case study: prioritize SMS, keep email as a strong complementary channel and avoid costly direct mail for routine reminders.

Introduction

The impact of mobile marketing can’t be overstated. According to IDC, more people in the U.S. will access the Internet through a mobile device than through their PC by 2015. In this new series, Elite Email takes a look at highly successful campaigns to uncover their mobile marketing lessons. This week’s case study: How Mobil1 Lube Express in Willow Grove Pennsylvania used smart SMS tactics to bring in customers and put an end to wasteful marketing expenditure. Taking the car in for a quick oil change is something that most people probably don’t do enough of on a regular basis. The folks over at Mobil1 Lube Express in Willow Grove, Pennsylvania knew this, but needed to find the right way to connect with consumers and make routine car care a top priority again. With this in mind, let’s spend some time digging into the particulars of how the experts at Mobil1 put SMS to the test against email and conventional direct mail reminders, answering the question of “which is best?” once and for all.

The Grand SMS Experiment

This entire case study begins with a competition of sorts. As part of its overall marketing promotion, this quality automotive service provider pitted SMS communications against direct mail and email offers to find which method generated the highest return on investment (ROI.) From here, Mobil1 Lube Express could then focus on streamlining its advertising budget by migrating away from the strategies deemed inefficient by this program.

Enacting the Strategy

To begin the promotional outreach, the various Mobil1 locations in Willow Grove and the surrounding areas supplied in-store consumers and participating local businesses and civic areas with hand-out cards. After receiving a card, customers then opted-in to the program by texting his or her license plate number, as well as the short code “OILCHG” to the number supplied within the instructions. After doing so, the customer identified the preferred channel – either text, direct mail, or email – for receiving an oil change reminder and limited time offer for discounted service.

Tallying the Results

Over the course of six months, Mobil1 Express Lube compiled the results for each channel in order to determine a victor. In total, 2,187 of a possible 6,849 customers opted-in via one of the three selected methods. On average, 21 percent of the individuals who chose a traditional mail reminder returned to claim the discount offer within 45 days. For the email and text alternatives, this number jumped to 29 and 35 percent respectively, leading the marketing team for this brand to declare SMS marketing the most responsive of the three channels.

However, the team also found that the text-oriented portion of the audience didn’t just claim the offer in greater numbers, but also responded faster. When compared to consumers who received no reminder, the group that chose the SMS route returned an average of 8.4 days sooner than either the email or direct mail respondents.

Based on these results, as well as the costs associated with shipping out direct mail, email, and SMS messages, Mobil1 Express Lube found that texting with customers also generated the highest ROI. In fact, when compared to direct mail’s $24 return on each dollar spent, the $308 and $344 generated per dollar spent by email and SMS respectively proves that this comparison isn’t even a close one.

In case you’re wondering about the average cost of each channel that went into factoring these ROIs, Mobil1 provided a general breakdown that paints an even more unflattering picture for direct mail programs. In terms of SMS messages sent, Mobil1 spent a grand total of $0.20 per text to returning customer. While email was a close second at $0.24 per message to returned customer, the whopping $2.76 in supplies and shipping costs accumulated per mailed postcard proves just how prohibitive archaic marketing tactics can be for businesses on a budget.

Finding the Right Blend for Your Brand

Now that Mobil1 Express Lube did all the work for your brand, the lesson from this case study is clear – SMS marketing, when conducted properly, offers up the biggest bang for your buck. Additionally, email marketing had a strong showing as well, which in turn signals that a strong blend of the two definitely has a spot in many marketing budgets. Regardless of which of these routes you choose, the message is as easy to understand as the discount promotion offered by the team over at Mobil1 Lube Express; if you want to connect with your customers, the best way to do so is by sticking to the mobile technology they prefer and avoiding the costly snail mail trap.

FAQ

What were the response rates for SMS, email and direct mail in the Mobil1 Willow Grove case study?

Within 45 days the campaign saw response rates of 35% for SMS, 29% for email and 21% for direct mail.

How did Mobil1 collect opt-ins and let customers choose their reminder channel?

Customers received hand-out cards in-store and locally, then opted in by texting their licence plate number and the short code “OILCHG” to the supplied number. After texting, customers chose their preferred channel: text, email or direct mail.

Which channel produced the highest return on investment in this test?

SMS produced the highest ROI at $344 returned per dollar spent, followed by email at $308 per dollar and direct mail at $24 per dollar.

What were the reported per-return costs for SMS, email and direct mail?

Mobil1 reported a cost per returning customer of $0.20 for SMS, $0.24 for email and $2.76 for each mailed postcard (supplies and shipping).

How much faster did customers who chose SMS return compared with email or direct mail recipients?

Customers who chose SMS returned on average 8.4 days sooner than those who received email or direct mail reminders.

How many customers opted in to the program and what was the opt-in rate?

2,187 customers opted in out of 6,849 possible, an opt-in rate of about 31.9%.

How long did the campaign run and where was it conducted?

The campaign ran for six months at Mobil1 Lube Express locations in Willow Grove and surrounding areas in Pennsylvania.

What marketing mix is recommended based on Mobil1’s results?

Prioritize SMS marketing (largest ROI and fastest response), keep email as a complementary channel and move away from costly direct mail for routine reminders.

Related Posts